KYC, KYB, AML screening and continuous watchlist monitoring on a single infrastructure, configurable to the framework that applies to you, with auditable evidence behind every verification.
For companies that are obligated entities under their country's anti-money laundering law and verify many third parties on a recurring basis: buyers, investors, clients, or suppliers.
Configurable to the anti-money laundering frameworks of Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, Costa Rica, Panama, Colombia, Mexico, and the Dominican Republic.
Global AML standards rest on four pillars: due diligence on individuals, due diligence on companies and their beneficial owners, continuous screening against restrictive lists, and auditable records of every check. Most teams cover them with a mix of vendors, email threads, and shared folders, and rebuild the file by hand every time an auditor or the regulator asks for it.
Automated Compliance runs the four pillars in a single flow. Identity, company data, beneficial owners, screening, and monitoring feed the same case file, and compliance validation stops being a project and becomes part of how you onboard your clients.
PoliBit is technology infrastructure, not the obligated entity: it does not replace the legal framework or the regulatory advice of your jurisdiction. The flows are configured to the due diligence, beneficial ownership, and screening requirements set by your country's law.
From the first verification to ongoing monitoring, with a single evidence record per client.
The verification flows come automated: you choose the scope and, at kickoff, we configure them with you.
What the platform does, what stays in your company's hands, and where the limits are.
Your company. PoliBit is technology infrastructure: it does not exchange, transfer, or custody assets, and it does not touch money. Regulatory responsibility stays with the regulated entity; Automated Compliance executes what your framework requires and leaves the evidence of having done it.
The platform generates the information, the evidence, and the report. Filing with the regulator is done by your compliance officer, under the regulations that apply to you. PoliBit does not report to regulators or decide on your behalf.
Where your framework requires it, your company registers or sends each operation and the rules engine evaluates it against thresholds, velocity, and patterns, in local currency or crypto. It does not connect to bank accounts or execute transactions: it detects and documents, and the decision belongs to your compliance team.
PoliBit connects to 1,300+ international watchlists through verification engines with certified repositories (SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 27001, 27017 and 27018, and iBeta Level 1 PAD). Verifications run with AES-256 encryption at rest, TLS 1.3 in transit, and configurable retention.
The four pillars are the ones most anti-money laundering frameworks adopt. If yours also requires transaction monitoring, the transaction rules engine is activated. Local specifics, such as report formats, add-on modules, or your own rules, are configured to fit. Coverage of national sources is confirmed per jurisdiction before it is committed in writing.
No. Automated Compliance automates compliance validation: it runs the verifications your framework requires and leaves auditable evidence of each one. Compliance remains with your company, which is the obligated entity and keeps its framework, its policies, and its compliance officer.
No. The platform generates the information, the evidence, and the report; filing is done by your compliance officer under local regulations. PoliBit does not report to regulators.
Against more than 1,300 international watchlists: international sanctions (OFAC SDN, UN, European Union, HM Treasury), PEP levels 1 to 4, adverse media, financial crime and terrorism financing, and regulatory warnings. The depth of national sources varies by country, so coverage is confirmed for your jurisdiction before it is committed in writing.
With document verification (OCR across more than 14,000 document types in more than 220 countries, including MRZ), active liveness with iBeta Level 1 PAD certification from the engine's providers, 1:1 face match, and device and IP analysis. Where the country allows it, data is also validated against official registries; registry coverage varies by jurisdiction.
Not as an official certificate. We screen against sanctions, PEP, and adverse media lists and the FBI and Interpol most-wanted lists; that is list screening, not a criminal record certificate issued by a national authority.
From the guided declaration of the legal representative, based on the ownership or control threshold set by your country's law, supported by the company's documents. Each declared person goes through their own KYC verification.
As infrastructure, yes: the KYC, KYB, and screening flows are configured to the due diligence and beneficial ownership requirements of your framework. Your company remains the obligated entity, and your compliance officer files the reports with the corresponding authority in your country.
It depends on your annual verification volume and on whether your framework requires transaction monitoring. Request a demo and we will share a proposal.
AI/ML adoption in AML rose to 90% of institutions by 2025, with AI-powered KYC tools reducing identity verification time by 42%. As the AML market grows from $4.4B in 2025 to a projected $23.8B by 2035 at 18.7% CAGR, fund managers face intensified enforcement and the necessity of proactive compliance.
Discover how digital subscription management automates investor onboarding, reduces processing time, and ensures KYC/AML compliance across 1,300+ watchlists.
Tokenized securities create unique compliance challenges: smart contracts enforce transfer restrictions, but investor identity verification must still occur off-chain. Modern platforms automate KYC/AML verification across 1,300+ international watchlists while feeding verified investor data directly into ERC-3643 permissioned token contracts.
68% of firms experienced cyberattacks in 2023, with IBM reporting average breach costs near $5 million in 2024—a 10% year-over-year increase. As LPs elevate cybersecurity to a fundamental due diligence criterion, fund managers must demonstrate robust security postures or risk allocation losses.
See in a demo how compliance validation runs inside your onboarding flow: KYC, KYB, AML screening, and evidence in one place.
Schedule your free demo